The notorious Easton durability and holding compression pre-2017 is all but gone. Easton has mocked Miken and Worth on shaky durability if not worse. Pick your poison budHas anyone got one yet? If they are testing 240-250 in the wrapper are they going to last past 40-50 swings? Last years tested at 275 and only lasted maybe maybe 200 before they wouldn’t pass compression.
The notorious Easton durability and holding compression pre-2017 is all but gone. Easton has mocked Miken and Worth on shaky durability if not worse. Pick your poison bud
PM Milocoman for best price aroundWhat are the new fire flex going for $
Too much lol..What are the new fire flex going for $
Too much lol..
I'll wait to see if they come down by years end like the rest of them have..
The bad part to all this is that most everyone wanted this. Me personally i like to do bp but i know i cant hit my new stuff to much because they will fail compression. The ones I've seen fail are around the 3 to 400 range, not the old eastons of past forsure. I have the purple nurple with about 175 swings on it an it tested at about 230. Good bat but the durability may not be there.
I still don't understand why they can't just be right at 220 pass and start and stay there period.
Can't tell me with all the R&D and tech, that the bats with the discs etc couldn't be evolved to lights out from wrapper and durable enough to just stay there.
.
I'm sure giving out $300 msrp easton's for $50 Combat warranties hasn't helped any either. All manufacturers are rolling with the times at this point, or at least making a valiant effort to. Nobody wants to spend time breaking bats in anymore, and the customers are the real losers here. You pay the same money for a bat that lasts half as long or even less
I still don't understand why they can't just be right at 220 pass and start and stay there period.
Can't tell me with all the R&D and tech, that the bats with the discs etc couldn't be evolved to lights out from wrapper and durable enough to just stay there.
I think them failing compression is something they want in the lower untested levels tbh which just seems wrong but sells bats I guess?
It would be one thing if the bat exploded once failed or cracked significantly - But to fail with tonnes of life left is annoying af.
I think Easton had no choice but to get on par with the rest. Selling $99 bats after 6-7 months was likely not working too too well, and I am sure those at higher level were pretty vocal in saying they didn't hang with Miken/Worth. Especially the higher level guys in provided bat tourneys. That's where you really say the truth on the first morning. The sponsored guys losing serious performance swinging NOW Eastons while the rest of the guys are out there beating in 1 side of a Miken/Worth and after 2 innings it's gas.
Seriously, why would a company put work into developing bat you describe when they can make the current bats for a fraction of that cost and we'll buy them?
What are the new fire flex going for $
If Easton can tell ASA what bats to ban why wouldn't they just ban all monstas, demarini, and miken?
Exactly. That would also explain the money grab they did by banning the ASA Flex, Extended, and others
nice that's a good deal for sure. so far from what I have seen this bat is good bat.
I thought it was a decent deal. Hope the bat lives up to the hype. I'm used to Miken/Worth so this Easton Fire Flex has a different feel to it. So far after 20 swings it seems pretty decent. Curious once it gets up to the 100 mark if it gets hotter. Happy with the bat so far though.
If Easton can tell ASA what bats to ban why wouldn't they just ban all monstas, demarini, and miken?