I don't understand Easton sometimes. They seem to have a track record of not leaving well enough alone.
The 2012 Eastons are still arguably the best of the new utrip stamped bats. It's hard for me to put down my ST100s and I have plenty of teammates that still love their ST100Hs and SY100Ws. These bats all got hot reasonably fast (<200 cuts in most case) and last a few thousand cuts. They would compare favorably to any model released today.
The '13 L series and B series were solid bats but took considerably longer to break in, didn't get as hot and didn't feel as good IMHO. The '14 models took a step backward again as they seemed to take even longer to break in but I think the jury is still out on what their true performance is.
The same thing happened a few years ago. The CNT+, Flex and Extended were game changers and were probably the most popular bats out. The closest competition was a Miken Freak+ or a Freak and even then I'd argue for the Eastons. The following year Easton comes out w/a new version of the Flex and re-launch the Stealth line with the SCN4. The CNT+ and the SCN4 were the two hottest non ultra bats I've ever owned. After one more year they stop making the CNT+ and Flex, and start producing stiff, non performing stealths and 1 piece bats. The SCN6, 9, 12 were all very disappointing with only a few folks saying "Gee, just wait until you get 1500 cuts on it, they get fun". Never happened for me. It wasn't until the SCN15 line that you got Eastons that actually somewhat performed in under 500 cuts.
Why does Easton continue to trip all over themselves? Why must they try to fix what isn't broke? Do they really need to reduce the cost of warranty returns to zero at the risk of selling less units and losing market share to manufacturers whose products perform better faster?