Leatherman
New Member
I enjoy reading opinions on this forum about why “new” Horween seems different from the old stuff. I figured I should contribute something too, so I wrote to Horween and ran a couple of those theories by them to see what they had to say.
I got a reply from someone with the last name “Horween”, so I've got to believe the info they shared is as accurate and authoritative as we're going to get. The answers below are word for word from their reply email:
Q1: Has there been any change to the chemicals or tanning process used for your ball glove leather (referred to as code55 leather by at least one manufacturer), such as changes required by the EPA, etc.?
A1: Code 55 is tanned the same as it always was, but the featherlite product is the same product with different oils
Q2: Have modern beef-growing practices affected the quality or characteristics of the hides you receive to any noticeable degree?
A2: It is really hard to comment accurately. Our feeling is that some of the characteristics of the leather are different because of the practice of growing the animals larger more quickly.
Q3: Do glove manufacturers specify how thick of hides they need, then have you split it for them, or do they take whatever is produced and then split it themselves?
A3: Both, they specify for the thickest parts of the glove and then they split parts for the where the glove requires thinner leather.
Q4: Do the glove companies get to control the oil content of the leather they buy, or is that left to the discretion of your tanners?
A4: They request certain levels that we then match
So, in summary, the tanning process is exactly the same, hides are subtly different, and thinner oilier code55 exists because the manufacturers demand it.
The biggest surprise for me was learning that they can turn good code55 into that bizarre featherlite stuff just by adding different oils. Who would've guessed?
Thanks to everyone who expressed an opinion or theory about the subject in previous threads. I’m sorry I didn't have time to find who originally suggested each theory.
Anyway, I hope this helps further the conversation and maybe get some talk going on the boards; they've been pretty slow lately.
I got a reply from someone with the last name “Horween”, so I've got to believe the info they shared is as accurate and authoritative as we're going to get. The answers below are word for word from their reply email:
Q1: Has there been any change to the chemicals or tanning process used for your ball glove leather (referred to as code55 leather by at least one manufacturer), such as changes required by the EPA, etc.?
A1: Code 55 is tanned the same as it always was, but the featherlite product is the same product with different oils
Q2: Have modern beef-growing practices affected the quality or characteristics of the hides you receive to any noticeable degree?
A2: It is really hard to comment accurately. Our feeling is that some of the characteristics of the leather are different because of the practice of growing the animals larger more quickly.
Q3: Do glove manufacturers specify how thick of hides they need, then have you split it for them, or do they take whatever is produced and then split it themselves?
A3: Both, they specify for the thickest parts of the glove and then they split parts for the where the glove requires thinner leather.
Q4: Do the glove companies get to control the oil content of the leather they buy, or is that left to the discretion of your tanners?
A4: They request certain levels that we then match
So, in summary, the tanning process is exactly the same, hides are subtly different, and thinner oilier code55 exists because the manufacturers demand it.
The biggest surprise for me was learning that they can turn good code55 into that bizarre featherlite stuff just by adding different oils. Who would've guessed?
Thanks to everyone who expressed an opinion or theory about the subject in previous threads. I’m sorry I didn't have time to find who originally suggested each theory.
Anyway, I hope this helps further the conversation and maybe get some talk going on the boards; they've been pretty slow lately.