Country469
Well-Known Member
You caught me. I'm part of the conspiracy to screw your team over. I'll flip and talk. Pm only
Sounds like 75% of SBF swings glass.sounds like you play on really sandy fields
For reference Bobby, we hit BP on that same field every saturday with a combination of your BP rockets and some BP52+. We've never had a homerun over 330 or so with the 52+'s. Only the rockets have carried like that ball did.Something dont add up herr, Playing with senior bats and Hot Microcell balls and I dont see the kinda shots your talking about on the reg. That team must be flat mashers
Never understood why they give older players, with slower reflexes, hotter equipment.old guys are weak tho thats why they need to use senior bats and hot mirco cell balls
If This thread was about the tester ,why do you keep bringing up performance or how many frozen ropes the other team hit?For reference Bobby, we hit BP on that same field every saturday with a combination of your BP rockets and some BP52+. We've never had a homerun over 330 or so with the 52+'s. Only the rockets have carried like that ball did.
We use a Dudley 52/300 for league night, Thunder Heat.
If This thread was about the tester ,why do you keep bringing up performance or how many frozen ropes the other team hit?
According to you, even on the possibly wrong tester your bat tested within fifty pounds of their bat, so the bats not really the problem. What happened in the game isn't an issue either unless you just want this to be about the other team cheating.
Compression testing is an inexact science, and as far off as his results were from your previous results, the two bats weren't that far apart.
325-330 homeruns are common here when someone gets a hold of one.
This ball slammed the fence on the girls softball field thats 7 feet high and prob would have landed 345-350 which is exactly the kind of performance I'd expect from a modified bat
For reference Bobby, we hit BP on that same field every saturday with a combination of your BP rockets and some BP52+. We've never had a homerun over 330 or so with the 52+'s.
What do you honestly expect the people shaving bats to tell you? Nah man, once we Shave it it hits the same as it did before. Shaving a non linear bat is stupid, and so is the idea that polymer coating the inside of the barrel retains compression. If it does, then it just undid all the performance you gained by shaving it. If that magic polymer existed the bat companies would make their walks thinner then just spray that goo in there.The truth is no one that has answered or responded seems to know any more than the average joe about compression testing or how bats will respond either once shaved. It's an interesting topic.
I reached out to the local company that advertises shaved rolled sticks and passed along this same information apparently they polymer coat the inside now to not only get compression back to legal limit and DC41's will pass even with the inner barrel cut out as long as the polymer coating is done? 15-30 feet is exactly what you'd expect to gain performance wise on ASA bats with .52/300 as well according to the company as well. It's basically the difference between warning track power and a homerun in most cases but someone that can put one out on a 300 ft field would see shots in the 330-340 range.
I quote directly from the horses mouth "340+ is hard to do with a .52 even with shaved and rolled modern ASA bats. Senior bats and others can get there easier."
Was this bat cut? I don't know but you superstars need to stop fronting like any of you are consistently putting a ball 330+ with a .52/300 and legal ASA equipment.
Just had a bat tested this week and they told me that they see Miken ASA bats fail NIW on a REGULAR basis.
A guy on my team had his Primo test very close on the pass/fail line NIW.
that is absolutely possibleI have a 2018 Harvey that at the last test was about 1000 hits passed by 100.
Maybe this is the first time you ran into someone that knew how to Accurately operate the tester. That would explain why your bat tested a different number.Hey guys,
Had an issue at championship night for our local league tonight. Last year before the season ending tournament they took all bats and tested and those that didn't pass were not allowed to play in the championship tournament. This year we show up and they decide it's not "worth it" to test. The league director says test before the season because someone could test valid and then go "roll or shave it after anyway."
The team we were set to play first we've played 3 times already this season. First two times we saw nothing special but the last time we played them they showed up with a ASA 2018 DC-41 (we have one on our team as well, mine) and all the sudden they have a homerun (320ft field, it clears by 30+ feet almost in the other field with .52/300) and everyone that uses the bat hits an absolute rope. Balls are through the infield faster than we can react and line drives to the outfield are crushed. This bat was on loan from another team in our league. I called it out and made a point that no one our our team has ever hit a ball like ANY of the balls that came off that bat even though we have the same bat, even in the same weight 27 oz.
After we mention it to the league director he agrees to test both DC-41's, ours and the other team. He comes back and says "theirs is 1450 PSI and yours is 1475 PSI". 1300 PSI is pass/fail for this bat according to the paperwork. Now I've had mine tested 3 times over the last month for other leagues I am in (they test and then sticker to validate) and mine has consistently tested 1340-1360 depending on the tester. I mention this to the LD and get a smart remark about "you got what you wanted with the bat testing and you're still questioning it".
So I'd like an honest opinion or some advice from others on the board. I've never seen a bat hit like this teams bat. It sounds different, and the ball carries like nothing I've seen crush .52's before. We have some absolute mashers on my team and we've had homeruns but nothing even like what we saw off their bat the week before. Is it a cut bat? Will cut bats still pass compression? Why were the compression results so far off compared to the other parks I've had mine tested at? 1475 from my understanding is higher than mine even comes from the factory and I have about 1500 hits on mine.
Ideas? Thoughts?