geeeeeeeez..... how is this even possible?
Ding, ding, ding...we have a winner.
FOUL BALL
position of ball if not touched determines fair or foul. If it would have landed fair or if it would have landed foul with no outside force. player touching it had not effect, even if they say "but the player was in fair territory and reached over foul to catch and drops it, its a FOUL ball....
position of ball if not touched determines fair or foul. If it would have landed fair or if it would have landed foul with no outside force. player touching it had not effect, even if they say "but the player was in fair territory and reached over foul to catch and drops it, its a FOUL ball....
So you asked an extremely basic question, that you already knew the answer too why?
This is funny. The similar question was asked on a FB forum and there were almost 200 comments, going back and forth fair/foul, and there are a lot of people that think if the fielder's feet are fair the ball is fair, and where the ball touches the ground. One guy preludes his post with how many associations and national tourneys he's umpired, and said if the fielder's feet are contacting fair territory then its fair, but if he's diving it's where it's touched....SMH. It's not as basic as you would think.
Pretty sure he's calling you an idiot for asking a question that 10 year olds know.
Hey guys...
I know the answer already but what is 2+2?