I don't really consider .52/275's to be mush balls. They seem to carry just fine with any bat as long as you get back spin
Wouldn't this make sense that a stiffer non broken in bat would actually be better for hitting softer balls like classic +?[/QUOT
which one of your bats is performing the best? i see a helmer and z in your sig
We have found that the old fashion metal bats hit them the best. You don't need high tech bats to hit those suckers and it always comes down the batter and not the bat.
Wouldn't this make sense that a stiffer non broken in bat would actually be better for hitting softer balls like classic +?[/QUOT
which one of your bats is performing the best? i see a helmer and z in your sig
For classic M balls I'm liking the Z2000 the most. None of them feel good and it's hard to tell a difference with the classic + but that's just the ball.
I'm sure that pstz is terrible on them, especially if the graphics are decent, let me know if I can help with the disposal of that substandard bat for you.
I don't really consider .52/275's to be mush balls. They seem to carry just fine with any bat as long as you get back spin
its the softest ball i have ever hit. its mushy to me.
Not being a smart ass but what do you consider to be a mush ball then ? A 52/275 is the lowest compression rating ball and is notorious for feeling and sounding like rubber when hit.
i dont think they are mush, if you a hit hard enough to hit the 52 cor center the ball flies. i guess if you use a crappy manufactured ball it would "sound like rubber" or be mush. I dont see what the big deal is, I tend to agree with hacksaw. I guess it depends on what your LD or TD decides to use. A lot of my buddies like the new Z2000 with these balls
Not being a smart ass but what do you consider to be a mush ball then ? A 52/275 is the lowest compression rating ball and is notorious for feeling and sounding like rubber when hit.
its the softest ball i have ever hit. its mushy to me.
Wouldn't this make sense that a stiffer non broken in bat would actually be better for hitting softer balls like classic +?
Keep in mind, the low compression balls were developed with four objectives in mind.
1. Minimize the risk of injuries when struck with a batted ball
2. Reduce the affect that decreased and increased temperatures have on the compression
3. Equalize bat performance
4. Reduce the damage to bats
After using these balls almost exclusively for the last year in Texas (in temps as low as 31 degrees and as high as 108) I can confidently say all of these have been achieved.
Wood bats mash 52 275's. You read that correctly.
Wood bats mash 52 275's. You read that correctly.