A ball tipped in fair territory that goes over the outfield fence is obviously a HR. How about this play? An outfilder tips a ball in FAIR territory and the ball goes over the outfield fence BUT in foul territory.. I would call it a HR also but would I be correct?
Speaking USA, this is a two-base award (RS 26.c)
not according to this... and your RS26C is only for games played on shortened fields
Section 8. HOME RUN RULE
NOTE:
a. Any fair fly ball touched by a defensive player that clears or has cleared over the fence in fair territory, should be declared a fourbase
award and shall not be included in the total of over-the-fence home runs
RS
26. HOME RUNS / FOUR BASE AWARDS / GROUND RULE DOUBLES.
When a ball does not hit the ground and leaves the playing field in fair territory,
it is a home run. In Slow Pitch, any fair fly ball touched by a defensive
player on either side of the fence that clears or has cleared the fence in fair
territory, should be declared a four-base award and shall not be included
in the total of over-the-fence home runs.
A. A batted ball hitting a foul pole above the fence is a home run.
B. A batted ball hitting the top of the fence and bouncing over in fair territory
is a home run.
C. A batted ball going over the fence in fair territory at a distance shorter
than the recommended minimum distance is a two base award.
D. A batted ball hitting a defensive player in fair territory, but going over
the fence in foul territory is a two base award.
E. A batted ball that leaves the park in fair territory and first touches the
ground in foul territory is a home run.
No such condition set in the 2019 book, page 133
No such condition set in the 2019 book, page 133
whoever wrote that rule is a moran
I would call neither a home run.
Error, with whatever base award it is. And when its an award based on carrying or moving the ball out of play, it should be consistent across the board. It would make more sense for them ALL to be a ground rule double rather than a 4 bases on a ball landing over a fair fence.
I fail to see how the play is any different if you are in the lf corner, canseco scenario, and it goes fair vs foul by a foot or whatever.
The chance it happens to an infielder or any other position is either so low it laughable or moot based on field dimensions and design.
I have argued this with State UIC's in both USA and USSSA as well as with the National Director of Officials for USSSA. The ruling in both associations is consistent, if the ball is touched in fair territory but goes over the fence in foul territory it is a two base award. I feel it should be a four base award but no one in upper management agrees with me.A ball tipped in fair territory that goes over the outfield fence is obviously a HR. How about this play? An outfilder tips a ball in FAIR territory and the ball goes over the outfield fence BUT in foul territory.. I would call it a HR also but would I be correct?
What rules are you umpiring under? I'm pretty sure this was on both the USSSA and USA umpire exams the last couple years.