Nothing pisses me off more than a dude who assumes **** and then starts talking **** shortly after. But by all means keep making those assumptions.
Did I ever assume anything? Confused here.
By saying: "Shooter Malones had no business being there, no matter what name they were going by."
And then: "Ben I'm gonna be blunt with you: I really don't give a **** that we got beat. I spent Sunday mowing the lawn and napping. I also know I ain't going to be returning to BD as I entered under the premise that we were playing lower level teams. Not Comatose."
And: "I was the one who after the game told everyone that you gotta play better teams to be a better player and that even though we got destroyed, it's still a learning experience."
When rules are in place to limit the number of 'upper level' players and they are adhered to, everyone is on a even playing field. To say a team had no reason being there, be it Malones or Comatose, and then say you don't give a darn if you lost because it's a learning experience doesn't make any sense to me.
Lets just say 5 members of all the better teams were regular roster players. This means that the 5-7 remaining roster spots are fill ins. A chemistry is not made of this. Raw teams can beat 'elite' teams with this format. It's all in the talent a team brings with.
I don't talk crap. Most often I speak the truth, hurtful or not.
And kudos for not giving up. Just remember that while you're napping or mowing the lawn, most of the upper level players are working on their game. They often live for family and softball.