Durability really only depends on how long you want to swing a bat. If you're a guy that likes the newest bat, or wants to try something different, what good is durability to you? If you only play a few league nights, a few tournaments, durability isn't high on your priority list either. If you do however play a lot of tournaments, take a lot of BP, and let other people swing your bats, suddenly durability is important to you. Personally, durability doesn't matter to me. I prefer 2-piece bats, and something that flexes so I can feel the ball off my bat. I have over 4500 swings on my OG 100H I got in 2012. I've hit mostly stadium ZN's, Launch 650, Evil Long Haul tour balls, Blue Dots, and Classic M ZN's with it, and it still passes compression at 225-230, depending on the tournament and who calibrated the tester. For me, this is the best bat for my swing and preference. I now also have an ASP from last year and the new SBE from this year as my back up's. Once you find something that fits your swing, fits your budget, and meets your needs, you have it figured out.
The bats today are made to certain specs, some companies borderline those specs based on customer feedback. If you're not going to take much BP, Worth/Miken/Combat/Louisville Slugger is the way to go as they have pushed the limit out of the wrapper and sacraficed some durability. If you enjoy taking BP, and want more durability, Easton/Demarini/Mizuno/Boombah/Baden would be your better choices.