Anyone else hear...

chris21

chris21

Addicted to Softballfans
Longball 28 said:
Now you are just making **** up....
Click to expand...

I'm just relaying what was told to me by a person AT the equipment testing....I have no reason to make this **** up....bat standards will change from time to time for one simple reason: to make the bat companies and sanctions money.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
p17

p17

SBFs 16th all time poster
chris21 said:
I'm just relaying what was told to me by a person AT the equipment testing....I have no reason to make this *&%^ up....bat standards will change from time to time for one simple reason: to make the bat companies and sanctions money.
Click to expand...

ASA was not shaving bats and testing them. Every bat would fail the test if they did that. The point of post-abi bats is to not let them break in past 98mph, that is all.


And and nice job breaking forum rules while talking to a mod
 
WarningTrackHR

WarningTrackHR

Last Brawh Standing
p17 said:
ASA was not shaving bats and testing them. Every bat would fail the test if they did that. The point of post-abi bats is to not let them break in past 98mph, that is all.


And and nice job breaking forum rules while talking to a mod
Click to expand...

Which forum rule did he break?
 
iowa_kid

iowa_kid

Manager
Supposed to be just that the bat won't break in past the 1.20bpf standard whether it be breaking by that time or I've heard worth/miken are using there spiral something crap.. Where your supposed to leave it to the umps decision and banking on him actually checking them...

I'm guessing each manufacturer will have different ways to figure out how to get into the standards w/o letting it pass the standards.. But I heard the same as u.. Initially our state director told me they were tryig to get a bat that started out at it's peak 1.20 performance and slowly get worse the more you swing it.. Don't know how that would be possible at all... But its all pretty much just for money IMO... Either way you look at it, they're makin big bucks off it, whatever there reasoning and approach at it is... Pockets are gettin full either way
 
Longball 28

Longball 28

Repping the Vinci
chris21 said:
I'm just relaying what was told to me by a person AT the equipment testing....I have no reason to make this **** up....bat standards will change from time to time for one simple reason: to make the bat companies and sanctions money.
Click to expand...

p17 said:
ASA was not shaving bats and testing them. Every bat would fail the test if they did that. The point of post-abi bats is to not let them break in past 98mph, that is all.


And and nice job breaking forum rules while talking to a mod
Click to expand...

Exactly, right P17. There is no way ASA was shaving bats during testing and nobody who was actually at the bat testing told you that Chris21. You are just making **** up, no shaved bat would pass the ABI testing. And yes we all know that bat testing standards change to make people more money that is no secret there...
 
Dogue

Dogue

Evil Genius
That's no swear filter violation, if that's what you're getting at. He didn't substitute a letter or two...he did the whole word (like a cartoon swear).
 
p17

p17

SBFs 16th all time poster
Dogue said:
That's no swear filter violation, if that's what you're getting at. He didn't substitute a letter or two...he did the whole word (like a cartoon swear).
Click to expand...

Cartoon swear = bypassing the filter
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top