Dear petebanta,
So let me get this straight... you're the pitcher. A ball is hit to the outfield and the female catcher, who seems to have been instructed to cede her responsibility to you on any play at home doesn't even have the sense to move the properly discarded ("unseen") bat. You, while running to cover home, fail to see the properly discarded ("unseen") bat and you step on it. This causes you miss the throw and the runner is safe. Now you want the BR called for INT because the bat was in your way.
petebanta said:
It is NOT the catcher's job to remove bats, it is the batter's job (or his teammates) to keep it clear of the play area.
By this reasoning, every batter would have to to throw their bat over a fence or into DBT after hitting the ball.
petebanta said:
Why should the defense be concerned with offensive equipment?
Because of the exact situation you described in your OP.
petebanta said:
If the rules don't say it is the catcher's job to do it, it seems it is the batter's, since it is his piece of equipment (same way defense cannot throw glove in way or runner/ball).
The rules don't specifically mention whose responsibility moving a discarded bat is. The defense throwing a glove at a batted ball is a deliberate act engineered towards nullifying the offense's ability to score runs or advance runners. What if the situation had changed to this: bat is discarded 5 feet up the line in foul ground. Throw is off-line and hits the bat. The ball then goes into DBT, allowing the BR to advance 2 bases from the time of the throw. Do you want an INT call because the bat was in the way of a wayward throw? Did the BR know exactly where the throw would hit and place his/her bat in that exact location? Unless the batter knew your exact path of approach to the plate before the play happened, they did nothing wrong. Sounds to me like your catcher should either be making the play OR you should have her clearing the bat if its location is going to be an issue.
The rules are a framework for the umpires to interpret and players must adhere to the judgment of said umpires. Your situation ended in a judgment by the umpire that the bat was not deliberately placed by the BR in order to hinder your ability to make a play on the runner. So: the runner is safe and BR gets to stay where they are. Question was asked, you didn't like the answer. Then you tried to argue the semantics of the rulebook wording and it got you nowhere with some highly respected and qualified arbiters.
If this were a court case it would have been thrown out due to lack of evidence.