HabanaSugarKings
Member
So I originally came here looking for reviews on 44 Pro, and reading all of you guys has shifted me to the Rawlings/Wilson (I like Rawlings better, but I’m not married to it)thus the name of this thread.
I go traditional, close my gloves thumb to middle/ring, never pinky, and have long skinny fingers with a tiny wrist. Play mostly mid inf but also sub in at 3b sometimes.
Locked at home I’ve read a lot of very informative posts the past few days, but my head is spinning a little bit, so I started this thread so you guys can confirm my impressions and give me a recommendation.
At first an NP7 sounded like the perfect glove for me, but I’ve been gaming a 12.5 for the past couple of years and am really hesitant to give up the .25”. So my three finalists are:
302 or 208, with the 302 Being more snug fitting??so might fit me better, and the 208 being wider, more conducive to TIP and closing thumb to pinkie??(not my type of glove).
And finally the SP125, which based on what I’ve read and video I watched, sounds like it was made exactly to what I’m looking for?
so tell me, did I process all your great info correctly? Or is my understanding wrong? Thanks!
I go traditional, close my gloves thumb to middle/ring, never pinky, and have long skinny fingers with a tiny wrist. Play mostly mid inf but also sub in at 3b sometimes.
Locked at home I’ve read a lot of very informative posts the past few days, but my head is spinning a little bit, so I started this thread so you guys can confirm my impressions and give me a recommendation.
At first an NP7 sounded like the perfect glove for me, but I’ve been gaming a 12.5 for the past couple of years and am really hesitant to give up the .25”. So my three finalists are:
302 or 208, with the 302 Being more snug fitting??so might fit me better, and the 208 being wider, more conducive to TIP and closing thumb to pinkie??(not my type of glove).
And finally the SP125, which based on what I’ve read and video I watched, sounds like it was made exactly to what I’m looking for?
so tell me, did I process all your great info correctly? Or is my understanding wrong? Thanks!