How is there a "questionable legaility" in the DNA, Bombardier, and Torch? I'm not a nut rider or a complete hater/rep of another company, so I'm in the middle. I have a DNA and had a Bombardier for a while but couldn't get used to the handle flex and sold it.
I saw the roster for the OKC Combat tournament and most of those guys aren't full time Monsta swingers, so I can see them not knowing that the Bombardier is 26-27 only and misspeaking.
The Bombardier passed ASA testing 5-7 times before ASA granted it full blown certification. I'm friends with a rep in the midwest from the group that hinted towards other big companies in ASA wanting Demarini and Monsta looked at closer during certification because they didn't have an inner barrel tech (which Monsta and Demarini have and are very alike). That's likely possible.
My stance is this: if you don't like Mosnta, okay, don't talk about them. This is just free advertising. Carl won't last long and we all see that, so let him die on his own. If you like them, cool. Swing it.
I saw the roster for the OKC Combat tournament and most of those guys aren't full time Monsta swingers, so I can see them not knowing that the Bombardier is 26-27 only and misspeaking.
The Bombardier passed ASA testing 5-7 times before ASA granted it full blown certification. I'm friends with a rep in the midwest from the group that hinted towards other big companies in ASA wanting Demarini and Monsta looked at closer during certification because they didn't have an inner barrel tech (which Monsta and Demarini have and are very alike). That's likely possible.
My stance is this: if you don't like Mosnta, okay, don't talk about them. This is just free advertising. Carl won't last long and we all see that, so let him die on his own. If you like them, cool. Swing it.